I'm here looking again for further help:
last saturday I was free to go for the first time by the sea with my
Kayak and the
Elite5Ti+ Totalscan
I think that something has to be finetuned to have clear recordings.
At first attempt I logged at 800khz.
Then I tried the 450Khz.
(strangely the 450 log shows a track that is lot shorter than I expected , since I mostly made the very same path of the 800khz scan.
I'm quite sure I did not stop the recording, but maybe I did. Anyway The size difference is not as much: 255MB for the 800khz and 202MB for the 455khz sl2, so I'm left doubtful...
First of all My area of interest is the
Italian Adriatic sea coast:
- the area I usually visit is plenty of bays with cliffs that vertically go down as deep as 10 to 12 meters. (Going more than 2 km away from the coast;
- Between bays we have few beaches which decrease smoothly. Average depth about 6-8 meters.
- The bottom is full of hard rocks fading from the cliffs, mud and fine sand. Here and there you can find isolated rocks.
- Most of the time the water is turbid due to the current that raises the mud.
At present the Elite is set in
General Use Fishing Mode
I'll show you some screens. Please report what is not good in your opinion. (I'm concerned about the 450khz pictures since it seems that some rocks are doubled on the right side, and the left side is not as clear as expected.)
800khz sl2:
450khz sl2:
800khz sidescan view
450khz sidescan view