No. I installed RM 2.1.46 and get 2 types of raster in it. In IMC and we can have 3 raster layers in one map:
1. Satellite imagery - visible as Photo Overlay (lowest layer)
2. Shaded relief - visible if we select Shaded Relief in device.
3. Raster nautical chart - visible if we select Raster charts
At the moment, I can get 2 types of raster from RM.
1. Shaded relief
2. Raster nautical chart.
It is very inconvenient to save the image in RM and process it separately in IMC.

Hey, Matt.
Can I expect changes to my question in the next RM release?

Never used RM to generate Satellite Imagery. Now created small test project - yes, for both SI and SR RM generates Shaded relief, all ok for RNC.
Seems need to be fixed. And it would be fine if output folders will be named ShadedRelief, SatelliteImagery, RasterChart.
Now we get ShadedRelief for all 3.

Ershal, can you please give me some more information on your raster export - ideally a screen shot of the AT5 export window with your options visible.
Specifying the raster type is not as straightforward as it could be, and the tests I have run this morning show that the IMC project file (at least) is correctly configured for all 4 raster types when generated by RM. Can you also check what the IMC is saying when you are generating via RM? The raster process takes a while, so you should be able to bring the IMC to the front and take a look at the raster options and see which type of raster it says it is generating.
I will continue testing here this morning.

When generating a raster via IMC, I get 3 types of raster map output, which can be distributed across layers.
1. Satellite (the lowest layer)
2. Shaded relief. 3. RNC (instead of vector layer).
In cases of getting the map via RM, I get 2 types of raster: Shaded Relief and RNC. If I select satellite, the output is also Shaded. When you start generating a raster map in RMc with the Satellite raster type, the value in the running IMC does not change and remains Shaded Relief.

The problem is in the IMC version. If I run with 0.7.4, all fine.
If with 0.7.4.39 wrong type.
Seems ershal got IMC beta at the same time as RM 2.1.46

У меня 2.1.52 и Вы это знаете :) Да у меня IMC 0.7.4.39

OK, thanks for clearing things up with regard IMC version. Most people don't run the beta, so we won't be updating RM until the changes in the beta are rolled out - if/when that happens.

Sad about "if". But seems so...

That's not very good.
I know many users of IMC 0.7.4.39 and this version provides more features. I hope you will get better in the future.

I will look into it Ershal, and see if there is a fix that will allow RM to work with both correctly, but if there isn't we have to give priority to the publicly available version of the IMC and not some beta version that only a small percentage of users have access to.

Thanks, Matt.
That would be good.