DannyGeysen wrote:
gpiverson wrote:
Surfer Grid Format (v6 or v7) wouldn't be a bad format to be able to export to, as well.
Gregory, can you tell us what are the benefits of Surfer Grid Format? Or more in general, why should we use Surfer for? I am not familiair with that package.
ESRI's open grid format is ASCII text whereas Surfer is a straight binary format.
This makes Surfer faster to read by applications (and especially faster to read a specific depth within the grid because it can seek directly to it). Since the format is binary, the outputted files are smaller. The processed Z value ranges are available in the header which makes it so you can generate color scales while parsing only the header.
This said, I don't use the Surfer package but a ton of companies use their grid format (including Lowrance). The only thing I dislike about the Surfer7 is the data is stored with double precision (not necessary in a depth grid) and can't be toggled in a setting so we exclusively use Surfer6...when you have hundreds of gigabytes (and soon to be terabytes) of depth grids on hand, doubling the size of these depth grids can get expensive.